![]() ![]() ![]() You need to include the perspective of science, to whit: ![]() The first spectacle was born with the first campfire ( you sorta covered this a little) Please support PEL!Įnd song: "Millionaire" by The Mekons (1993), one of whom, Jon Langford, Mark interviewed on Nakedly Examined Music #22.Īssert: no one, ever, who rhapsodizes about authentic labor, has ever done it. Seth mentions this discussion of the book featuring author Will Self.Ĭontinued from part 1, or just get the ad-free Citizen Edition. ![]() You can read Debord's 1988 follow-up, Comments on the Society of the Spectacle, here. Podcast: Play in new window | Download (Duration: 1:09:15 - 63.5MB)ĭo we buy Debord's critique? Is any merely partial critique (i.e., not calling for revolution) just more spectacle? Is technology inherently dehumanizing? Haven't some of these passivity/anti-technology arguments even been launched back in history against things like books? Could Debord's model of authenticity be mass produced, i.e., is this something that we can achieve as a society as Debord hopes, or merely as individuals (if that)? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |